On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 02:20:37PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > - should we extend this further and say, if we no longer assume NEVRAs > > are monotonically increasing in a new release, we should allow > > packagers to use this opportunity to drop epochs in Rawhide? (likely > > with proper announcement beforehand in devel@) > > > Who will check reverse dependncies? E.g. perl will drop "Epoch: 4". Who will > check that no other package "Requires: perl > 4:..."? I remind that > fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional gating test is still not enforced > globally. > Good point. I'm still following up on trying to get the current gating tests enabled for EPEL -- and there are still occasions where they don't run on Fedora too. There's also the issue that, AIUI, the installability check tests whether the packages in the update set are installable, but does not check whether they break any revdep... room for improvement there, and maybe that can be tackled first. Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind (né Salim) _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
