V Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 01:12:38PM -0500, Michel Lind napsal(a): > - should we update the packaging docs? Does this need to be a new Change > Proposal or does this just need to go through the Fedora packaging > committee? (Those involved in the Change like zbyszek can probably > advise here) > FPC with an anouncement on devel list should be enough. > - should we extend this further and say, if we no longer assume NEVRAs > are monotonically increasing in a new release, we should allow > packagers to use this opportunity to drop epochs in Rawhide? (likely > with proper announcement beforehand in devel@) > Who will check reverse dependncies? E.g. perl will drop "Epoch: 4". Who will check that no other package "Requires: perl > 4:..."? I remind that fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional gating test is still not enforced globally. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
