Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:15:16PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely.
> Thus, the proposal:
> - new packages MUST use rpmautospec
> - packagers SHOULD convert their packages
> - provenpackagers MAY convert existing packages
>   (e.g. when they want to push some fix or separately from other
>    work)
> - people submitting pull requests against src.fp.o MAY also
>   include a conversion in the pull request and packagers SHOULD
>   merge it.
> 
I don't like it because:

- It breaks upgrade path in downstream distributions (e.g. fixes in RHEL minor
  releases).

- I sometimes need a different commit message from an RPM changelog entry.

- I prefer "fedpkg local" over mock (faster, smaller, easier to debug).

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux