On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 12:28:34PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:15:16PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely. > > Thus, the proposal: > > - new packages MUST use rpmautospec > > - packagers SHOULD convert their packages > > - provenpackagers MAY convert existing packages > > (e.g. when they want to push some fix or separately from other > > work) > > - people submitting pull requests against src.fp.o MAY also > > include a conversion in the pull request and packagers SHOULD > > merge it. > > > I don't like it because: > > - It breaks upgrade path in downstream distributions (e.g. fixes in RHEL minor > releases). Hmm, can you provide describe the workflow that is broken in more detail? > - I sometimes need a different commit message from an RPM changelog entry. That's not a problem, the %changelog entry is customziable, see https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autochangelog.html. > - I prefer "fedpkg local" over mock (faster, smaller, easier to debug). That also just works. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
