On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:26 PM Tom Hughes via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 08/04/2024 14:47, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > It is already supposed to be default / preferred since this Fedora 38 Change: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default > > I find that quite interesting because while I may have read it at > the time I had certainly long since forgotten that. I read it at the time, and it was promised (at the time) that rpmautospec would be a recommendation, and not a requirement. I would have strongly objected to a MUST. That rpmautospec works fine for some is great (for them). And it can be a good default for many (if someone asked me how to package something new, I would suggest they consider rpmautospec). However, as long as it does not work 100% of the time in 100% of the use cases (and by it's nature, it can't) means that it should never (can never) move forward to a MUST. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
