Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 3:28 PM Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So someone wanted to use rpmautospec and was willing to do the work, putting things together as an opt-in feature. Perfect.
>
> Now, I don't see any problem if some time later someone revisits the topic and proposes to go further. I don't see anything unfriendly here. Everything was set or decided at some point, and nothing could ever be changed if we don't allow ourselves to change our minds and be free to make new proposals.
>
> That said, we are also free to reject those proposals, and I'm -1 here. As of today, I think it's fine as an opt-in feature, and I'm even using it for some small uncomplicated packages. But I don't think it should be the default with an opt-out.

It is already supposed to be default / preferred since this Fedora 38 Change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux