Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:30:01PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:23 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Dne 07. 04. 24 v 5:15 odp. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> >
> > I think it's time to switch to rpmautospec completely.
> >
> > -1 from me.
> >
> > While I enjoy simplicity of rpmautospec in some of my packages.
> >
> > I have bunch of packages where the spec is present also in upstream and the package is build for epel7 too. And I build the package locally (outside of dist-git) often. The enforcement would complicate my life.
> 
> +1 to the -1 (for basically the same reasons).

OK, so if there was an opt-out, like a file in dist-git 'norpmautospec'
(in analogy to noautobuild that packages use to opt out of automatic
rebuilds)?

Zbyszek
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux