Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:22 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 04/04/2023 07:52, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
> Perhaps new package requests could more often be handled in a way where
> an existing packager assumes the maintainer position with the agreement
> that the submitter keeps the packager updated and in good condition,
> through pull requests.

We have a serious problem here: non-packages can't upload sources to
Fedora SCM.

These pull requests require maintainers to do it manually in a separate
commit that breaks %autorelease+%autochangelog.

That's not exactly true. Yes, non-packagers can't upload files to the lookaside cache, but they can update the 'sources' and '.gitignore' files in git.

The easiest way to do that is with 'fedpkg new-sources --offline' which then only does the local modifications that can be committed to git (and submitted as a PR), but doesn't upload the files to the lookaside cache servers.

-- 
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux