>>>>> Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Again. This is not what we are telling them. Again? There's no need for that. In any case, what I wrote was the procedure I documented it when I set it up. If all of that documentation was lost, then I don't know what to say but that's not what was intended. I drove the change that made this happen. I made sure the documentation (in the wiki at the time) referenced the procedure. If that was lost after the time when I was able to be very active in Fedora, then that's a sad state of affairs and I don't know why that would happen, but it would be really good if it could un-happen. Did FESCo revert the policy change or something? >> I'm not aware of anyone in that state ever needing to wait very long >> before being sponsored. > Is two years long enough? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958193 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958190 You're saying that tickets were properly filed with the packager-sponsors tracker and those were not addressed? I checked the open tickets before responding. I didn't see anything. If tickets got closed without any action being taken, could you point out those tickets? That would be a rather odd state of affairs > And people are really confused / hesitant: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036288#c11 And how does this proposal help that? Why not just propose to document the actual process instead? - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
