Dne 03. 04. 23 v 19:09 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a):
> Again. This is not what we are telling them.
Again? There's no need for that.
I apologize. It was not my intention to sound harsh.
Is two years long enough?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958193
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958190
You're saying that tickets were properly filed with the
packager-sponsors tracker and those were not addressed?
No, I'm not saying that. Somebody has enough courage to open the package review, discuss it, get to the point that the
package review was approved. But did not have the courage to reach sponsors. It was road block for them. And it is quite
common. We can study the road block, trying to describe the roadblock. Or we can simply remove the road block and write
the sponsors (me included) that here is an issue waiting for them.
And how does this proposal help that? Why not just propose to document
the actual process instead?
I filed https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/118#
But I think this is not outreachy enough.
Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
