Re: Auto-assign packager sponsors to tickets?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benson Muite kirjoitti 4.4.2023 klo 7.02:
Thanks for this initiative Jakub. Automated builds on copr of packages
proposed for review has been very helpful.

I completely agree. Great work!

Benson Muite kirjoitti 4.4.2023 klo 7.02:
On 4/4/23 03:59, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:

 From this thread I get
the opposite impression, that Pagure tickets are processed quickly and
FE-NEEDSPONSOR blockers are not looked at. If so, I propose the policy
is updated to ask for a Pagure ticket in every case.

I get the same impression and I would agree with Otto's proposal to
get rid of the FE-NEEDSPONSOR entirely. Apart from it not being
processed as effectively as the package-sponsor repo tickets, the
FE-NEEDSPONSOR is confusing anyway (it is set to a review ticket but
the ticket doesn't need to be sponsored, the contributor does. That
becomes weird when the contributor has more tickets at the same time
and so on). But if I understand correctly, FESCo needs to be involved
and therefore this would be a long-term goal.

Actually, updating a FESCo policy is not difficult at all. Once the conversation settles down and there is a consensus on how the policy should be updated, just make a pull request for fesco-docs for it and file a FESCo issue asking FESCo to consider it. I would be very surprised if FESCo rejects it when it has been discussed in devel and the sponsors themselves back it.

Actually, in my experience, updating FESCo policies is often *easier* updating a random Fedora Docs page. FESCo has a documented process for handling tickets, and FESCo members actually do respond to them. For other docs, proposals for improvement sometimes get not reply at all, or get some comments but are neither merged nor rejected.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux