On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 03:13 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > I wasn't kidding. I've installed FC3 on my g/f box. She is a _very_ > non-technical user by any conceivable measure. However, she needed > access to a terminal day one, and now she always has one opened. Why did she need a terminal? > I understand the "this is a bug" idea (to a certain point), but > reality is harsh. It's going to take many years for this to change, Hopefully not many years. > and removing a generally useful feature way before its time is not > helpful. The terminal is still available. From half of the responses on this thread you'd think it'd been removed entirely. > Please do not misunderstand me: I think the removal is a mistake, > but I don't think it's a huge deal. I wouldn't have maybe even > posted at all in this thread if it was for the barrage of comments > like "go tell someone who cares", "take a hike, you're not our user", > etc. That's not at all what most of the responses were; see for example: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-July/msg00308.html -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
