-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: | Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 09:39 -0700, Per Bjornsson a écrit : | |>On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:17 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: |> |> |>>It's interesting to read people claim there is absolutely no problem, user |>>experience will be enhanced by a simpler desktop, when (for example) at |>>the same time Gnome browsers sink into obscurity and are replaced by |>>Firefox. |>> |>>Seems actual "basic" users would rather cope with the warts of a |>>non-native app than experience the full Gnome simplicity. |> |>I think that this is about the worst example you could possibly have |>chosen to go with. | | | Not at all. | For Mozilla people Firefox is simple. | But compared to Galeon or Epiphany - it's a very complex UI. | In fact if Gnome people took over Firefox today they'd be busily | removing scores of features. Compared to Epiphany, perhaps, but certainly not Galeon. Epiphany's goal was to make a simple UI, Galeon's was to cram everything under the sun into a GNOME interface. For a little history: Firefox is to Mozilla what Epiphany is to Galeon. Both Epiphany and Galeon lost their relevancy when Firefox and Mozilla started integrating into the GNOME desktop. There are still some warts, but most stuff just works. Firefox is now and always has been "Mozilla simplified". They took out UI for a lot of things, relegated more things to extensions and just plain removed features from Mozilla. The funny thing is, more people use Firefox than Mozilla these days "despite" its simplified UI. In fact, apart from the many Firefox extensions I have installed, the Firefox and Epiphany UIs are almost identical in terms of layout and functionality. Your argument is specious at best and your analogy faulty. If you don't like the general trend of simplifying the user interface, that's one thing, but it's definitely not a GNOME-only trend and certainly isn't going to stop. - -- Shahms E. King <shahms@xxxxxxxxxx> Multnomah ESD Public Key: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/~sking/shahms.asc Fingerprint: 1612 054B CE92 8770 F1EA AB1B FEAB 3636 45B2 D75B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC1XQ6/qs2NkWy11sRAhZxAJ9kJaekxAQoGBcOPLjr2vesryY4cACdFbnq 0qZ2LuPkZEQdxCKaE1MrOfc= =SQch -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
