Re: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 07:12:04AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not quoting anyone in particular but I thought I saw it referenced in this
> thread (and definitely the previous thread from last year).
> 
> What's wrong with having someone "sign" the CLA every year? At work a
> non-disclosure is only good for two years. Is a CLA a lifetime agreement?

IANAL, but, yes. I think the FPCA is explaining how Fedora accepts
contributions and we ask contributors to read and agree to it in the
account system, it would then apply forever after.

We could ask them to review it and ack it I suppose, but I'm not sure
what that would accomplish. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux