Re: Do we have any policy for disabling inactive users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> A quick (and likely
> bad and incomplete) bugzilla search shows
> over 1000 tickets where there are upstream
> updates that are still in NEW status in
> bugzilla and had been (initially) opened
> over a year ago.  I think that represents
> around 350 unique people.  Those people
> may be otherwise active, of course, but
> those packages themselves look to be
> under maintained.

Yes, that's a bad search. Till Maas told me eight years ago that the
release monitoring tickets are supposed to remain open when the
packages are upgraded. Thus an open Bugzilla ticket is no indication
that the package is unmaintained. You need to check what version is
actually in Rawhide.

If the Bugzilla tickets should in fact not be left open, then they
should be automatically closed just like they're automatically opened.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpgcM0FDXdzX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux