On 6/8/05, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6/7/05, condition terminal <conditionterminal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > if people do agree that it is a something worth > > taking to the RH legal team, then I will do so. > I think most people in this thread have already reached consensous on > this issue. I don't think its the outcome you personally want however. > But since you seem to want to keep count, I also do not think its > worth it. I think at this point the community is better served by > everyone doing what they can to help seth and others create a > buildsystem that is useful for a larger community build environment. > > -jef"has a pretty strong gut feeling the fsf would have already > approached redhat quietly about any compliance issues and worked to > correct any license violating behavior if there were any > present"spaleta > So ignore a potentional violation because someone else is planning to do the same thing, but better? Thats an interesting view point on possible GPL violations. ta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
