On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 18:41 +1200, condition terminal wrote: > > So ignore a potentional violation because someone else is planning to > do the same thing, but better? > > Thats an interesting view point on possible GPL violations. No, ignore this thread as most people (and lawyers that have looked into it) find no violation. And further more, even if there WAS a violation, most people on this list have 0 interest in seeing code to something that is outdated, useless and is going away. Instead they would like to spend time working on an ALREADY OPEN build system that is tagged to be the replacement. What is it you hope to gain by accessing beehive? Or is it merely that you want to soapbox about Red Hat being evil and possibly (very very very very unlikely) violating the GPL? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
