> True enough, so far as it goes; 'release of beehive' code > itself. But if the argument is that one may conceal from a > covered recipient under the GPL, the state of the build > environment which controls rpmbuild, autogen, ./configure, > etc, I certainly know of at least two lawyers who differ. We > presented in a panel discussion a couple years ago on the GPL, > and hit this topic at the Ohio Linuxfest 2003 ;) Then if that's the case it's an issue best taken up with fedora-legal or redhat-legal. No one on this list can do anything about it, I assure you. :) -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
