On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 14:32 +1200, condition terminal wrote: > I still see no answer. There have been plenty of answers > > I see people making jokes of this thread, but no answers. > > Why is beehive allowed to not be released under the terms and > conditions of the GPL when the GPL clearly states that files use to > build GPL code also have to be released under the terms and conditions > of the GPL? > > ta. > beehive does not effect the build of the package. an rpm built by my typing rpmbuild --rebuild foobar.src.rpm is NOT going to be different than if something else builds it. The spec file is included in the src.rpm The spec file specifies the BuildRequires, the configure switches, the patches (which are in a src.rpm), the install process, the file permissions. All that is in the src.rpm and NOT in the build system that happens to rebuild the src.rpm for distribution. If that is not what you want to hear, fine - but don't then claim your question has gone unanswered. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
