On 6/8/05, condition terminal <conditionterminal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So ignore a potentional violation because someone else is planning to > do the same thing, but better? You asked for a concensous opinion about whether or not to continue to press forward with this. I've done exactly what you have asked, I gave you my opinion as to the worth of releasing rawhide. I think concensous has been reached in this thread.. and its contrary to your desire. I'm not qualified.. nor are you... to make a serious legal determination as to whether their is a violation in this space. I am quite confident that competent legal opinion both inside and outside of RedHat have look at this. I would be shocked if the fsf hadn't already made a determination with regard to the beehive situation. You are of course free to go ask the fsf about what they think about this situation. And while your on their site, make a donation ( https://www.fsf.org/donate/directed-donations/gpl.html ) that will go towards serious efforts by serious people to enforce gpl compliance. It's time to face facts, continued discussion on this list about your desire to compell the release of beehive is going to get you nowhere. Its time for this discussion to end here. If you believe there is a violation here its now time for you to find a competent legal opinion who is familiar with the gpl and begin a formal legal review. > Thats an interesting view point on possible GPL violations. No... actually... all ianal view points are uninteresting.. both mine and yours. -jef"i dare you to donate"spaleta -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
