Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 09:27 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 09:17, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > David Kaufmann wrote:
> > > If abstentions would lower the necessary +1 votes, this would
> > > automatically give the author of a proposal a +1 vote for the
> > > proposal,
> > > depending on the author being in FESCo himself/herself.
> > 
> > It would actually give them only half a vote. Whether a single half
> > vote
> > amounts to a whole vote depends on how ties are handled.
> 
> How about making this simpler: plurality wins
> 
> If the plurality is +1, then it passes
> If the plurality is +0, then it goes to more discussion (or drop
> because people are tired).
> If the plurality is -1 then it fails
> If there is a tie, it goes to more discussion.
> 
> So a 4 +1, 5 0, 0 -1 means more discussion.
> 
> Yes there will be corner cases, and ways to rig things.. there is no
> system which is going to beat Arrow's theorem. We either deal with it
> at the time or give up now because there is no perfect solution and
> no
> group of people are going to agree that there is a good solution
> either.

This will not happen because the policy says that if at least 3 people
gave +1 and nobody gave -1, after 1 week it is approved exactly so that
tickets are not being held in endless loops of discussions.

So how is it different if it gets approved on a meeting with +4,±5,-0
or just waited for another few days and get auto-approved? This is the
issue Stephen is proposing to solve.

> 
> -- 
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- -- 
Igor Raits <ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=fmfA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux