Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > You would not expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the problems
> > of all packages written in C and C++, so why would Java be any
> > different?
>
> Honestly?  I totally would expect that.  Wouldn't that be better for
> everyone?
>
> Compilers aren't special here: every package that wishes to continue to
> have users *needs* to care about those users.  Maintenance and features
> need to be tailored to actual use cases.  Otherwise, it's a waste of
> time, and just further irritates said users.

That's not the place for such discussions, this is not a problem that
is general to Java (and wouldn't be general to the C or C++ languages
in the case of the GCC example above), is specific to Fedora and even
more specific to some of the packages and needs to be addressed within
the Fedora community. If there are problems that leak upstream in
terms of patching requirements the maintainers (and perhaps the
package users) have the duty to carry this work, you can't expect the
rest of the world to discuss those issues during a developer
conference dedicated to the programming language and its development,
even when there is a mild overlap in interest because some of the
involved people are the same, and neither you can draw conclusions on
the interests of the Red Hat Java leadership based on the schedule
alone.

To get back on topic, I don't have the feeling that the java packaging
is so dismantled, and I use java packages from RHEL and Fedora often,
but I do know there's a series of problems with some of the packages,
and I understand from this thread that some of the issues stem from
the decision to use modules (sorry, I don't make the rules here, and
while I also don't understand why modules are such a hot topic I can't
help on the merit). Now, a constructive discussion would go toward
suggestions on how to fix those problems not focus on pointless
deliberation on what or how the Java DevRoom should be run and whether
it should transform into a Fedora Java Packaging DevRoom.

So, what are your suggestions, and what can we do to help?

Cheers,
Mario

-- 
Mario Torre
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat GmbH <https://www.redhat.com>
9704 A60C B4BE A8B8 0F30  9205 5D7E 4952 3F65 7898
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux