On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > It would be interesting to analyse all those things, not to plan an rpm > replacement, but to actually fix the things upstreams are not happy > about (and, a lot of time, those won't involve rpm, and when they do > involve rpm fixing rpm will be easier than rewriting it from scratch). I can get behind this approach. To make it work we need to look at the things where 1) upstreams are not happy and 2) we can provide value for both dev and ops. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
