Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> The way Eclipse is treated makes me really sad and kind of regret the time
> spent on Fedora over the years! Being forced to be a module but blocked to
> be default stream by FESCo arguing over whether it wants modularity
> (sorry, this is how it looks) is the best way for Fedora to show to
> project and people they are not wanted in the community!

You should not blame the people arguing over whether more and more default 
streams are a good thing for your trouble, but the people who caused your 
trouble to begin with by modularizing the Java stack.

Java needs to be demodularized. Completely. As a platform (i.e., a 
programming language and/or a set of libraries, Java is both), it is 
absolutely not suited for modules, because they are version conflicts 
waiting to happen. Platforms need to be treated the traditional way, 
shipping one system version, and if that is not enough, parallel-installable 
compatibility packages in addition.

The lack of parallel installability makes modules only suitable for leaf 
packages.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux