Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12. 11. 19 17:02, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
Again, no one forces you or any other packager to use modularity
tooling right now.

As Fedora developer you have a choice to join the effort, bring your
input and use cases, try and test (and revert if it doesn't work) or
you can stay away from it and keep using same tools as before.


Unfortunately, this is not true. It is not possible to ignore modularity, if the dependencies are modularized. It is not possible to ignore modularity, if the dependents are modularized. It is not possible to ignore modularity, if the packages I wish to use are modularized.

I wish Fedora packagers and users cold "stay away". But that is currently not possible. My proposal to keep all defaults as non-modular packages would make it exactly so.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux