Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 13:50:58 -0700, stan wrote:
> Isn't this kind of thing a question for legal?  Is there any liability
> for fedora that arises from using encumbered software from FOSS?  I've
> seen other people refer to running things by legal on this list.  I'm
> not sure how to do it, though.

I wouldn't think so. Legal clears up unclear licensing. The software
here (SPM for example) is clearly under an Open source license. We do
not consider non free software at all.

You can get in touch with legal by e-mailing them on their mailing list
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Discussion_of_Licensing)
or blocking the "FE-Legal" blocker bug if on a bugzilla review ticket
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Special_blocker_tickets)

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,

Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux