On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:05:58PM +0000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 13:50:58 -0700, stan wrote: > > Isn't this kind of thing a question for legal? Is there any liability > > for fedora that arises from using encumbered software from FOSS? I've > > seen other people refer to running things by legal on this list. I'm > > not sure how to do it, though. > > I wouldn't think so. Legal clears up unclear licensing. The software > here (SPM for example) is clearly under an Open source license. We do > not consider non free software at all. > > You can get in touch with legal by e-mailing them on their mailing list > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Discussion_of_Licensing) > or blocking the "FE-Legal" blocker bug if on a bugzilla review ticket > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Special_blocker_tickets) I already sent a question to legal@fp.o regarding the issues in this thread. It seems to be stuck in moderation. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
