Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 16 novembre 2018 à 11:37 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> iable, and checking those in the installer)
> 
> * that effectively means:
>   * the only supported state is the current upgrade tip,
>   * you have an N-era window where upgrades to the current tip are
> supported baring hardware problems
>   * you have a Z-era window where upgrades to the current tip should
> not
> require hardware changes
>   * any software state older than the latest installation state may
> require long reboots in automated upgrade environments

And of course that also means hardware manufacturers can design and sell
hardware pre-installed with Fedora installation states, and market them
with a customer usefulness period of Z-era minus their own
integration/production time.

And N/Z are not driven by the upstream or packager level of investment,
but by the maturity of the Fedora installation and upgrade tech, and the
means you give to QA to make sure Fedora commitments are kept.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux