On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 04:36 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > > > > > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including > > > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? > > > > AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in > > Firefox. I don't know exactly where their 'lines' are, but they are > > known to assert trademark rights against downstreams to prevent them > > changing some things and still calling the result 'Firefox'. (This > > policy is why Debian ships 'Iceweasel' or whatever instead - so they > > can modify it how they like without Mozilla complaining). > > -- > Same for fedora - if you want to use the trademark. Well yes, that's exactly the point I was making - there was a suggestion to make downstream changes to some upstream defaults as part of a response to this, I was saying we don't have an entirely free hand to do that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
