On 12/08/2017 12:10 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 12:01 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> On 12/08/2017 11:46 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: >>> You're blowing this way out of proportion, as if this was a >>> catastrophe. History shows that it isn't. >> >> Maybe I am... Would not be the first time! ;-) >> >> In last couple of months there were a couple of changes >> that were non-critical so I'm getting the feeling >> people are getting a bit embolden... which is worrisome. >> >> Then on the other hand I get these pull-requests that >> work sooooo well! >> >> So I just don't understand why for non-massive changes >> why is it not required to go through the pull-request >> process? > > This wasn't a trivial change. > > It certainly was trivial for each package it got applied to, but it got > applied to quite a few packages. > > That's essentially a similar change to mass-rebuilds, just at a smaller > scale. > > It was also announced properly on this list, enough time in advance, so > it shouldn't have taken you by surprise. > > If you really want to insist on the maintainers's responsibilities, > start by reading announcements on this list. :-) This is a very tough list to keep up with.... I generally look for things on delve-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I must have missed it... pull-request go directly to my in box... much easier to find ;-) steved. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
