On 12/08/2017 11:46 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-08 at 11:40 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> On 12/08/2017 11:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> Well, I'd say this works great. There's maybe a hundred or two >>> hundred proven packagers and somehow none of them decide to mess up >>> the kernel any day. In fact, the commits which caused this thread >>> are _correct_: >>> so far I haven't heard one word to the contrary. I don't see any >>> point in discussing hypotheticals. >> >> You are telling me there hundreds of people that have complete >> control over all the packages in fedora with no boundaries??? >> They can do anything they what??? Wow... > > And it's working just fine, because overall people understand their > responsibilities and don't abuse their powers. > > If someone ever does go too far, their probvenpackagers permissions can > be revoked and the bad changes they made can be reverted. Good to know... > > You're blowing this way out of proportion, as if this was a > catastrophe. History shows that it isn't. Maybe I am... Would not be the first time! ;-) In last couple of months there were a couple of changes that were non-critical so I'm getting the feeling people are getting a bit embolden... which is worrisome. Then on the other hand I get these pull-requests that work sooooo well! So I just don't understand why for non-massive changes why is it not required to go through the pull-request process? steved. > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
