On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 12:29 +0100, Peter Oliver wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > it sounds like downgrading from 56 to 52 > > (the most recent ESR), aside from the epoch bump it'd require on our > > side, is not straightforward (it seems there were profile changes > > between 56 and 52). > > Ouch. > > Is now a good time to think about how we could try to avoid getting into a similar situation again in the future? > > I see that Firefox ESR releases are supported for one year plus twelve weeks (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/). For Fedora 27, would it be safer to include Firefox 57 and 58, but then stick with Firefox 59 ESR from March onwards? We've chosen not to ship ESR in the past, AIUI, because we think our target audiences generally prefer to get the main Firefox release stream, they don't want the ESR stream. We could change that decision, of course. I don't personally think a one-off ouch-y event like this would entirely justify such a change, but it'd be interesting to know if the Quantum stuff means a series of such ouch-y events might potentially be coming to the main release stream. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
