* Matthew Miller [25/08/2017 16:23] : > > From a user perspective, > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ works very well for me (and > it's _way_ faster than it was several years ago). I would agree if it wasn't for packages' issue #286 I suspect that packages uses pkgdb to get the information it displays so arguing that the former can replace the latter after its retirement seems misguided. > From a contributor > perspective, https://src.fedoraproject.org/ seems adequate if not yet > perfect. The ability to display readme files _alone_ seems like a big > step forward. It'd be nice to have better search and browsing, but the > original pkgdb web UI wasn't great there _either_. It's still has a number of critical issues (#6208 is the biggest one that comes to me). I think Neal's point is that we knew this was coming. We knew that pkgdb retirement would be half-baked before it happenned. We even discussed it on this very list. Couldn't we have delayed the pkgdb retirement until it had less issues? Can we learn from this change and ensure future changes are handled better? Emmanuel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
