Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 13:28, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 19 July 2017 at 11:56, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And since there's no easy way
> > to track bundled stuff inside Flatpaks, we're much worse off than
> > where we are with RPM packages currently.
> 
> I'm getting somewhat sick of the hyperbole, but I'm wondering if
> you're aware of
> /var/lib/flatpak/app/org.gnome.Recipes/x86_64/master/active/files/manifest.json

It doesn't contain a separate "version" tag for each bundled component,
so it's barely useful. One would need to parse the "url" tags for
version numbers. So, I stand by my words: no easy way to track bundled
stuff.

Can such "modules" dependencies be satisfied with components from
a(nother) runtime, assuming their sha256 hashes are the same? And by
"satisfied" I mean that they won't be downloaded from the repo when
installing an application with such deps and will be deleted from
existing applications if they appear in any installed runtime after an
update.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux