Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:23 PM Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Well, it isn't some theoretical construct... it's being done now with KDE and has
been working just fine.  It stays in updates-testing until you decide to push it to stable.  KDE
folks by and large want the updates as fast as possible.  If the GNOME folks would like
their updates to age for six months, they can just keep them in updates-testing.   Seems
like we're just making this more complicated than it is.

You can't keep things simmering in updates-stable for a long time.  What if you need to push a bug fix or security fix that is not tied to a new major upstream release?

Rahul 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux