On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:22:41AM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > Well, it isn't some theoretical construct... it's being done now with > KDE and has been working just fine. It stays in updates-testing until > you decide to push it to stable. KDE folks by and large want the > updates as fast as possible. If the GNOME folks would like their > updates to age for six months, they can just keep them in > updates-testing. Seems like we're just making this more complicated > than it is. Right, KDE on Fedora is more like a rolling release. TBH, this is something of a luxury because none of the Editions are dependent on KDE. If Workstation were KDE-based, I'd be inclined to push back against the practice. I don't think anyone said we want the GNOME updates to "age" for six months. What I'm saying is that the release model allows us to provide a new shiny version quickly after the upstream release, but users get to choose if they want it right now. If we did this by putting a big GNOME update into updates-testing, a) people would have to opt into getting testing updates to get it, or do the even more advanced thing of cherry-picking from the updates repo, and b) once having done that, would presumably get all future updates to that stack through updates-testing, and c) if there's a fix to the older GNOME, we wouldn't have a way to provide it. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
