Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/2016 05:55 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:

I disagree with this assertion.  Flatpak, snappy, docker containers,
etc are not an indication people are giving up on Free Software.  They
are a mechanism the focuses on easing a developer's ability to
distribute their software without worrying about learning arcane
knowledge of each distro's packaging system.

But these packaging systems produce source and binary packages at the same time. In contrast, I have yet to encounter a container build service which does that. This has the side effect that GPL compliance and general availability of matching source code is rather poor. As the result, free software loses.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux