That is not 100% correct. You can make a non-sandboxed Flatpak and it would work just as well as an RPM in terms of hardware access. Enabling sandboxing however would need some thought and development for a lot of such applications, but we are slowly but surely working on it through things like the PulseAudio and Pinos work that Wim Taymans is doing, and through the work that Alex Larsson has been doing with OpenGL. Christian ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Neal Gompa" <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 10:21:32 AM > Subject: Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You're right, it's better :) > > > > Not really. Flatpak is incredibly limited in its abilities. > Applications that interface with hardware directly are out of the > question, for example. That means lots of pro-AV applications simply > won't work properly in that environment. > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
