Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:27:36AM -0500, Christian Schaller wrote:
> That is not 100% correct. You can make a non-sandboxed Flatpak and
> it would work just as well as an RPM in terms of hardware access.
> Enabling sandboxing however would need some thought and development 
> for a lot of such applications, but we are slowly but surely working
> on it through things like the PulseAudio and Pinos work that Wim Taymans
> is doing, and through the work that Alex Larsson has been doing with OpenGL.

How far are we from "If it's an RPM in Fedora, we can automatically
generate a Flatpak for you?"


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux