Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> repo data). The full list makes up most of the 40Mb downloaded. The
>> dnf developers seem to think that everyone has lots of data/bandwidth
>> and don't see the problem with it.
>
> Isn't the problem that the SAT solver used by DNF for dependency
> resolution doesn't know in advance if it will be needed or not, and
> there isn't an easy way of adding it in midway?

No idea of the exact details, by default yum didn't use all that data
so didn't download it (it's basically a full file list of everything
in all rpms) until it actually did need it which was never for
standard use cases. dnf downloads it all the time, this IMO is a
regression which can cost non insignificant amounts of bandwidth (eg
my parents have a 5Gb allocation a month, 40Mb a day * 30 days a month
is 1.2Gb or over 20% of their allocation).

Peter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux