Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:55:26AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> problem. The fact that updates default to auto-push after +3 karma is
> entirely plucked out of the air, it's just something someone made up
> one day. We could *certainly* change that. I'd be quite interested in a
> tweak where there's a minimum-time-in-testing value for autopush too,
> which would default to say 2 days. The way that would work is automatic
> push would never happen until the update had actually been in updates-
> testing (not queued for push) for that long. *Manual* push could still
> be done during that time, and the update submitter could make the
> minimum-time-in-testing value larger or smaller (as they can make the
> karma threshold for autopush greater or smaller). 2 days would just be
> the default (and is similarly a number I've just made up; we could make
> it something else).

What if we combined this time threshold with, also, auto-pushes happen
only on Monday (or whatever)?

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux