On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? > Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else? > Lets use Bodhi for Rawhide, where the submitted update would immediately > go into Rawhide, unless maintainer wishes some testing period. > Any comments on this topic? What if we leave Rawhide as it is, but create the new somewhat-better-than-Rawhide repo that Dennis Gilmore was talking about last year, and enable Bodhi on that? (The thing that I very desperately want to be named "Fedora Bikeshed".) In any case, I'm definitely concerned about the increased number of hoops. What if, when a build lands in Rawhide, a Bodhi update were automatically created for Bikeshed? It might be nice for the "fedpkg build" command line to take the "--type bugfix|enhancement|security" option so that could be passed on in some way. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
