On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception? >> Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else? >> Lets use Bodhi for Rawhide, where the submitted update would immediately >> go into Rawhide, unless maintainer wishes some testing period. >> Any comments on this topic? > > What if we leave Rawhide as it is, but create the new > somewhat-better-than-Rawhide repo that Dennis Gilmore was talking about > last year, and enable Bodhi on that? (The thing that I very desperately > want to be named "Fedora Bikeshed".) My concern would be further diluting and already thin QA community with yet another thing to test. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
