Re: Bodhi For Rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 27.10.2016 v 16:05 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> * And probably last think, why the Rawhide should be really exception?
>> Why we should not use Bodhi if we are using it anywhere else?
>> Lets use Bodhi for Rawhide, where the submitted update would immediately
>> go into Rawhide, unless maintainer wishes some testing period.
>> Any comments on this topic?
> What if we leave Rawhide as it is, but create the new
> somewhat-better-than-Rawhide repo that Dennis Gilmore was talking about
> last year, and enable Bodhi on that? (The thing that I very desperately
> want to be named "Fedora Bikeshed".)

This means to go to some unexplored lands. I am not sure I am fan of
this idea.

>
> It might be nice for the "fedpkg build" command line to take the
> "--type bugfix|enhancement|security" option so that could be passed on
> in some way.
>
>

But I like this one.


V.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux