Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:13:05PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I agree Jan's proposal looks like a good idea.  However, I can't but
> > help notice that its necessity is driven almost entirely by the fact
> > that we cannot use our existing bugzilla tool to do this job for us.
> > All of the extra app stuff could be avoided if we disallowed reporters
> > (or random people) to change the Severity and Priority fields.
> We could request this from bugzilla folks (restrict those fields to
> people in fedorabugs? Or should it be more restricted ?)

To be useful for this purpose, it's gotta be super-restricted. I'm not
sure if that will interfere with existing workflows.

Also, I think this only solves 10% of the problem (the "how do we
indicate") part. It doesn't solve the workflow and acceptance part.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux