Re: PROPOSAL: Blocking the release is our only "big hammer" — let's add a softer one.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:55:40 -0400
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:48:36AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:  
> >> @Matt: does it reflect your thoughts ?  
> >
> > Looks like a great place to start -- thanks. The one change I'd
> > make is adding a separate "Critical" level, for things that will
> > have us pacing the halls (figuratively) continually bugging people,
> > pulling in favors, etc.  
> 
> I agree Jan's proposal looks like a good idea.  However, I can't but
> help notice that its necessity is driven almost entirely by the fact
> that we cannot use our existing bugzilla tool to do this job for us.
> All of the extra app stuff could be avoided if we disallowed reporters
> (or random people) to change the Severity and Priority fields.

We could request this from bugzilla folks (restrict those fields to
people in fedorabugs? Or should it be more restricted ?)

kevin

Attachment: pgpz87dcgVyHB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux