On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:33:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > We used to have exactly this, up until Fedora 14. We had 'Target' [much snip] > lighter process than the blocker review process, though I don't have a > specific proposal for how that could look at this point in time. If it > would mainly be used by the FPL and FPM, perhaps it could simply be the > rule that they got to decide what bugs went on it? *nod* Based on your other message elsewhere in the thread, I promise not to pull you or anyone else in QA under the bus, but I miiiight drag Jan Kurik with me as FPGM. Jan, what do you think about doing a Lightweight Critical Issues Review Meeting every, say, two weeks? We could start it with you and me and anyone else who wants to show up, and give it a hard limit of half an hour. Adam, if we do that, would it be hard to add to the existing blockerbugs app, so we don't need to stand up new infrastructure? Then we could try it for a bit and see if it is working / helpful or just another crazy idea. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
