On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:20:06PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 18:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > If ABRT is a firehose of bugs flying to RH's bugzilla, would the > > situation be > > really better if the reports were sent to gnome's BZ? > > Yes, it would. Keep in mind that upstream maintainers are responsible > for far fewer packages than Fedora maintainers. A busy GNOME maintainer > might maintain 2-5 packages upstream, but 20-50 Fedora packages (not > counting comaintainence, then we're talking hundreds). It's a lot > easier to look at crashes for 2-5 packages than 20-50 packages. So, I'm going for the crazy idea front here, now that RHBZ is hooked onto fedmsg, should we try to write a tool creating bugs on GBZ for each gnome bugs created on RHBZ and sync comments between both instances? (well, we would have to see if we can get the GBZ onto a message bus of any sort) This would: * allow bugs to be reported upstream where more people can look at them * allow bugs to be reported upstream without the need for the original reporter to create yet another account on yet another BZ * keep the discussion in both places * eventually allow us to tweak things so that we try to report only bugs that are of interest (for example, we could start by reporting all the user-reported bugs, as opposed to those opened by automated tools (ABRT & others)) Call me crazy, but that was in essence my idea behind the question: `would things be really better if the bugs were opened on GBZ?` and you replied `yes` :) Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
