Re: F24, small backward steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/13/2016 07:19 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

 This is a truly awful experiance from POV of a Fedora user filing
bugs :-(
 We've set a silent trap for them with no warning of the fact that their
 bug reports are going to be ignored until Fedora EOL procedure closes
 them :-(

One lesson I have learnt in Fedora, is that filing bugs reports
against packages owned by certain people equals to sending bugs to
/dev/null.

IMHO, Fedora should consider to take disciplinary measures against
these people.

And get less packagers?

Yes, why not? A non-responsive maintainer, who is systematically not processing the bugs having been filed against his packages in RHBZ is cheating himself, Fedora's users and the Fedora project. He is not doing his Fedora job.

To cut a long story short: Such a person is harmful to everyone being involved and therefore should be facing sanctions.

It would be useful if package co-owners would automatically get added to
the bugzilla bug, instead of only the package owner. Most packages don't
have dedicated aliases for that.
Urgh? I thought this was the case?

Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux