Re: no systemd in containers: Requires -> Recommends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> Can you give realistic examples for these? Can you explain what you
> are intend to run as PID 1 in them instead?

Nothing, if the pid namespace did zombie collection in the kernel,
you don't need a separate init.

> What is cleaning up /tmp
> for those things? 

You bind mount the container's /tmp to a host /tmp/container-$uuid
for example.

> What is setting up the tmpfiles bits in /run for
> them, and so on?

One would carry this in the Dockerfile or equivalent if it applies,
although it doesn't for a lot of software.

Your broader point is very valid - we're going to need a lot
of software to run both on the host outside of a container,
underneath systemd, but we're also trying to enable a
fully container-only distributed/cluster model via Kubernetes/Docker,
and in the end microservice state, it just doesn't make sense
to have a systemd instance per microservice in a cluster.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux